Friday, February 15, 2008

Top 5 Most Urgent Sea-Changes

Someone checked out the blog the other day asked me what things need to change so badly in the Church. In other words, what's the Sea-Change all about? This post is a revised version of my quick answer. These are 5 of the most urgent needs in the Church as I see it.

1) Christianity out, Gospel hearts in.

Religion has to go, and churches full of hearts full of the Gospel must replace it. Jesus hated religion, so why would we focus on building one? The Church better soon begin to get this straight or we're going to be walking backwards another hundred years. When it comes to our faith: Jesus is everything. Religion is nothing. (read Philippians 3 if you don't believe me)

2) Global out, Local in.

The simplistic linear logic that has fueled modern missions is tragically misguided. Yes, a passion for global causes is a good thing. However, someone somewhere along the way forgot to think about how this emphasis on global missions might divert our attention from ministry in our own contexts. A better approach? Show people the power of the Gospel first hand in their own communities, and allow that glimpse to fuel a desire to see this power spread across the globe. Let’s quit having slide shows and ice cream socials to celebrate our missions offerings, and start changing our own cities.

3) Sissies out, masculinity in. (seriously)

If this offends you, I’m talking about you. It's time for us to realize that being mommy's good little boy is not the same as being a man. All best-sellers aside, men better figure out what it means to be men, and get to it (start with Genesis 1 and 2).
Jesus was the perfect image of masculinity--vulnerable as a child and a servant (lamb), and violent as a pharisee-smackin' whip-slingin' temple cleanser (lion). Don't be a sissy.

4) "Missions" out, church planting in.

This term, “missions” has taken on such a vague nuance and vanilla flavor among Christians that talking about it does more harm than good. There are many believers who have money they would like to direct toward Kingdom enterprises, if only they had an inspiring outlet. By redirecting this vanilla mission passion toward something as tangible as starting new congregations, we can reconnect the gift with the giver and good stewardship can become a matter of discernment rather than a matter of generosity only. Then pastors can stop whining about bad tithers and start showing people that their money is doing more than paying extravagantly high electricity bills. (by the way, we gotta quit being bad tithers!)

5) Seminaries out, churches in.

Easy, tiger. I know this is a touchy subject. If this weren’t a sound-byte culture, I would have said “out with seminaries and in with churches as the default institution for ministerial training.” Seminaries should still have their role. It will be up to the seminaries, however, to determine what their role should be. The role of the local church is more clear-cut--the local church must become a place where future ministers are trained academically and practically on a high level. This will require that local funds support an academic wing of the local church. It will require collaboration between the brightest minds and the boldest dreamers. It will require a rethinking of the way we do Church, not just the way we do church. Every church will have to become a strategy center for local, regional, national, and global kingdom advancement.

Maybe right now you are screaming amen (if you are actually yelling at a blog, seek psychiatric help). Let's talk. Or maybe you think I'm full of......it? Let's talk. Or maybe you have better ways to fix the same problems I mentioned. Let's talk. Or maybe you are going to steal all my ideas and do them first. I hope so. They're probably not my ideas anyway--originality is overrated.

5 comments:

daniel said...

ryan, some nice commentary and insights. I would submit that anyone asking why the current church needs to change is lacking some serious sight into the true kingdom and purposes of our god. If this is all that god intended for the church to become, then where is christ? shouldn't we be amidst the 2nd coming?

Rick Long said...

I appreciate this post very much. I have preached this to my people, and hopefully others over and over. Thanks for your insights here, very good stuff.

Brittney said...

i'm curious about what you mean by number 3, exactly.

living in another culture for a while has made me realize that the US has a very defined idea of what it is to be 'male/a man.'

i'm just wondering about what this looks like rather than 'whipping pharisees tails.'

check out my friend's/former church leader's blog for an interesting perspective on this issue.

http://bigbadmo.blogspot.com/2005/06/why-i-am-notwild-at-heart.html

Brittney said...

sorry--got cut off :)

http://bigbadmo.blogspot.com/2005/06/
why-i-am-notwild-at-heart.html

Ryan Coatney said...

Brittney,
The part where I said "all best-sellers aside" may not have been meant as a dismissal of the book your friend mentions, but at least it is meant as a divergence from it. I hopep to bring a balance when I talked about Jesus being not only a lion but also a lamb.

Some men err by becoming hyper-masculine (which is really its own form of emasculation). They beat their wives, yell at their kids, rape their girlfriends, and otherwise try and compensate for the fact they are really sissies. These same guys are the ones who curse out coaches when their sons don't get enough playing time in peewee football. They're just a peculiar form of sissy--not the toenail painting, capris wearing garden variety sissy.

Other men err by becoming momma's boys. They embrace the fact that they are sissies and forsake part of what has always been the celebrated nobility of the maculine soul: adventure and courage.

Take the Iliad for example. The men of Troy and the men of Greece couldn't be more different. The Troy boys were pretty as a peach. The Grecians rough as a cob. Still, they both understood the role of a man to be a defender of right and an adventurer. This doesn't negate the fact that brawling is a fruit of wickedness. It doesn't negate the fact that a man who can't control his temper is a city without walls.

Further, this view does not diminish the value of those who are walking in emasculation. All of us fall short of God's glory. The goal here isn't to point at one kind of person as "the problem". Sin is the problem. We're all guilty of it and those of us in Christ were being destroyed by it before we were rescued by his mercy. It just happens that a certain sin is very prevalent right now in America--I call it being a sissy. And I believe the Gospel is sufficient to redeem this.

I hope this answers your question...let me know if not!